From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Pham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 27, 2011
Case No.: 10-CV-2592-GLR (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-CV-2592-GLR

10-27-2011

BETTY PAUL Plaintiff, v. HOANG HUU NGYUN PHAM Defendant.

Todd C. Barrett #40032 HARRIS McCAUSLAND, P.C. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Matthew L. Bretz 1227 N. Main Street ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THE COURT, having reviewed the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice filed herein by the Plaintiff Betty Paul, hereby dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice towards the bringing of another action.

The costs of the action shall be borne by the parties that incurred them.

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.

GERALD L. RUSHFELT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

APPROVED BY:

Todd C. Barrett #40032

HARRIS McCAUSLAND, P.C.

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

Matthew L. Bretz

1227 N. Main Street

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF


Summaries of

Paul v. Pham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 27, 2011
Case No.: 10-CV-2592-GLR (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Paul v. Pham

Case Details

Full title:BETTY PAUL Plaintiff, v. HOANG HUU NGYUN PHAM Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 10-CV-2592-GLR (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)