From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PAUL v. INSTITUTO ARGENTINO DE PROMOCION

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1949
87 N.E.2d 682 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued May 27, 1949

Decided July 19, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DICKSTEIN, J.

Milton Schilback, Joseph M. Godman and J. Jacques Stone for appellant.

Bernard Axler for respondents.


We hold that plaintiffs have satisfied the requirement of notice imposed upon them by Argentine law (Code of Commerce, art. 473). It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine whether enforcement of article 472 of the Argentine Code would be repugnant to the public policy of this State (see Loucks v. Standard Oil Co., 224 N.Y. 99, 111). The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

PAUL v. INSTITUTO ARGENTINO DE PROMOCION

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1949
87 N.E.2d 682 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

PAUL v. INSTITUTO ARGENTINO DE PROMOCION

Case Details

Full title:FRED H. PAUL et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of F.H. PAUL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 1949

Citations

87 N.E.2d 682 (N.Y. 1949)
87 N.E.2d 682