From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 18, 2022
No. 13300-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

13300-21

10-18-2022

ARI PAUL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On October 12, 2022, the Court received from the parties in the above-docketed matter a Proposed Stipulated Decision purporting to resolve this litigation. That decision was premised on a Settlement Stipulation filed the same date establishing an overpayment for the underlying 2018 taxable year. However, review shows that the Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation reflect increased amounts for the deficiency and various additions to tax in excess of those determined in the notice of deficiency for 2018 which have not been properly pled or otherwise explicitly stipulated by the parties (e.g., as stipulations of the increased amounts incorporated in the Proposed Stipulated Decision below the judicial signature).

The premises considered, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation, both filed October 12, 2022, are hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case.


Summaries of

Paul v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 18, 2022
No. 13300-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Paul v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ARI PAUL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

No. 13300-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 18, 2022)