From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 18, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0130-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2013)

Summary

using the month-to-month DFW CPI calculation rather than an annual calculation

Summary of this case from Cockshutt v. Saul

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0130-G (BH)

2013-10-18

GREGORY BERNARD PAUL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, filed April 19, 2013 (docket entry 15), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby awarded $5,413.58 in attorney's fees, based on 31.10 hours of attorney work at an hourly rate of $174.07. Plaintiff is also to be paid $350 for reimbursable costs from the Judgment Fund.

SO ORDERED.

_______________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Paul v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 18, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0130-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2013)

using the month-to-month DFW CPI calculation rather than an annual calculation

Summary of this case from Cockshutt v. Saul
Case details for

Paul v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY BERNARD PAUL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0130-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Cockshutt v. Saul

Because the Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff's month-to-month calculation, using the more specific…