From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-599 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-599

03-18-2018

ELISABETH PAUL, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.


JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 26, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #24) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) should be DENIED.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 18th day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Paul v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-599 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2018)
Case details for

Paul v. Cisco Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELISABETH PAUL, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-599 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2018)