From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul T. Richman, P.A. v. Consol. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 1988
519 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-150.

February 9, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Thomas M. Carney, Judge.

Weinstein Preira and Richard J. Preira, Miami Beach, for appellants.

William A. Ingraham, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


The summary judgment against the defendant-counter plaintiff Richman is reversed in its entirety and the cause remanded for trial because the record shows genuine issues as to (a) whether, as claimed in the complaint, the plaintiff bank reasonably incurred attorney's fees in the amount sought in attempting to secure the payment of a debt owed by Richman; and (b) whether, as alleged in the counterclaim, the bank was guilty of (i) defamation of Richman's credit for untruthfully representing to a credit bureau that he had not appropriately made the required payments, and (ii) conversion by refusing to release its interest in the collateral and in insurance proceeds when its outstanding debt had been discharged by payment.


Summaries of

Paul T. Richman, P.A. v. Consol. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 1988
519 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Paul T. Richman, P.A. v. Consol. Bank

Case Details

Full title:PAUL T. RICHMAN, P.A. AND PAUL T. RICHMAN, APPELLANTS, v. CONSOLIDATED…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 9, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)