Opinion
2005-1625 KC.
Decided October 2, 2006.
Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Alice Fisher Rubin, J.), entered March 3, 2005. The judgment awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,930.50 and dismissed defendant's counterclaim.
Judgment affirmed without costs.
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and BELEN, JJ.
Upon a review of the limited record brought before the court in this commercial claims action to enforce a mechanic's lien, substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804-A, 1807-A [a]). After hearing the testimony of the parties, the court credited plaintiff's version of the events, and within the limited scope of review available in the commercial claims context ( see Katz v. Khaimov, 12 Misc 3d 134 [A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51198[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]; Farkas v. Schwartzenberger, 11 Misc 3d 129 [A], 2006 NY Slip Op 50296[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]), defendant has shown no grounds upon which to disturb this result ( see Ross v. Friedman, 269 AD2d 584).
Pesce, P.J., Weston Patterson and Belen, JJ., concur.