From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

 Paul S. v. Rita S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2011
92 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-30

In the MATTER of PAUL S. and Robin S., as Persons Having Placement of Colleen Y., Kelly Y., Michaela Y., and Bridget Y., Petitioners–Respondents, v. RITA S. and Ken Y., Respondents–Appellants.In the Matter of Katherine E.Y., Petitioner–Respondent, v. Robin S., Respondent,Rita S., Ken Y., Respondents–Appellants,andPaul S., Respondent.In the Matter of Colleen Y., Kelly Y., Michaela Y., and Bridget Y.Chautauqua County Department of Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent;Kenneth Y. and Rita S., Respondents–Appellants.In the Matter of Bridget K.Y., Colleen A.Y., Kelly T.Y., and Michaela M.Y.Chautauqua County Department of Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent;Kenneth y. and Rita S., Respondents–Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.).

Appeal from a corrected order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered August 12, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The corrected order, inter alia, denied the motion of Rita S. and Kenneth Y. to vacate the order of fact-finding and disposition entered March 5, 2010.Law Office of Robert D. Arenstein, New York City (Richard T. Sullivan of Counsel), for respondents–appellants. Jane E. Love, Mayville, for petitioner–respondent Chautauqua County Department of Social Services.


Appeal from a corrected order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered August 12, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The corrected order, inter alia, denied the motion of Rita S. and Kenneth Y. to vacate the order of fact-finding and disposition entered March 5, 2010.Law Office of Robert D. Arenstein, New York City (Richard T. Sullivan of Counsel), for respondents–appellants. Jane E. Love, Mayville, for petitioner–respondent Chautauqua County Department of Social Services.

Andrew t. radack, attorney for the Children, Silver Creek, for Kelly Y. and Colleen Y.Michael J. Sullivan, Attorney for the Children, Fredonia, for Bridget Y. and Michaela Y.

Same Opinion by Peradotto, J., as in Matter of Bridget Y. [Appeal No. 1], ––– A.D.3d ––––, 936 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2011 WL 6848352 [Dec. 30, 2011].

Fahey and Sconiers, JJ., concur with Peradotto, J.; Smith, J.P., dissents in part and votes to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting Opinion as in Matter of Bridget Y. [Appeal No. 1], ––– A.D.3d ––––, 936 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2011 WL 6848352 [Dec. 30, 2011], in which Lindley, J., concurs.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it concerns Colleen Y. and Kelly Y. is dismissed and the corrected order is affirmed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

 Paul S. v. Rita S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2011
92 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

 Paul S. v. Rita S.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER of PAUL S. and Robin S., as Persons Having Placement of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2011

Citations

92 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9688
938 N.Y.S.2d 481

Citing Cases

Paul S. v. Rita S.

In the Matter of PAUL S. and Robin S., as Persons Having Placement of Colleen Y., Kelly Y., Michaela Y., and…