From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 30, 2024
4:21-cv-00259-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 30, 2024)

Opinion

4:21-cv-00259-KGB

09-30-2024

ADAM PATTON ADC #169395 PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE RESPONDENT


ORDER

Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge

Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 15-1). Petitioner Adam Patton filed objections to the Recommendation, and defendant Dexter Payne filed a response to the objections (Dkt. Nos. 19; 20). After review of the Recommendation, objections, and response to the objections, and after a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15-1).

The Court writes to address the objections. Mr. Patton is currently serving a 26-year sentence in the Arkansas Division of Correction (Dkt. No. 1, at 5). Mr. Patton's claims arise out of the state trial court's decision not to appoint counsel to represent him at the trial that resulted in his conviction (Id.). Mr. Patton's objections largely re-use the language of his petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. Nos. 1; 19). Regarding several issues addressed by the Recommendation- whether waiver of Mr. Patton's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was at issue in this case, the decision of the state trial court to allow Mr. Patton's previous attorney to withdraw, and the decision of the state trial court that Mr. Patton was not indigent-after careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Patton's objections, the response to the objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that Mr. Patton's objections break no new ground and fail to rebut the Recommendation. The Court adopts the Recommendation.

For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts the Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15-1). The Court denies Mr. Patton's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1). The Court dismisses with prejudice this habeas action. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Mr. Patton may still apply to the Eighth Circuit for a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B).

It is so ordered


Summaries of

Patton v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 30, 2024
4:21-cv-00259-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Patton v. Payne

Case Details

Full title:ADAM PATTON ADC #169395 PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 30, 2024

Citations

4:21-cv-00259-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 30, 2024)