From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 28, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-02629-JKS-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-02629-JKS-KJM.

November 28, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice; and

3. This case is closed.


Summaries of

Patton v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 28, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-02629-JKS-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Patton v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE PATTON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, Acting Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 28, 2007

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-02629-JKS-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)