From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 29, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10-JWD-EWD CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-40-JWD-EWD

03-29-2019

BILLY PATTON v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL. CONSOLIDATED WITH BILLY PATTON v. DARRYL VANNOY


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 8, 2019, to which an opposition was filed (Doc. 18);

IT IS ORDERED that the consolidated applications of Billy Patton for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 are SEVERED for purposes of entry of judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Patton's pro se habeas petition in Civil Action 16-10 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Patton's habeas petition in Civil Action 16-40 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as procedurally defaulted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event the Petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal, a certificate of appealability shall be DENIED.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 29, 2019.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Patton v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 29, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Patton v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:BILLY PATTON v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL. CONSOLIDATED WITH BILLY PATTON v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 29, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2019)