From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 20, 2010
Civil No. 09-682-HU (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-682-HU.

August 20, 2010

Tim Wilborn, Wilborn Law Office, P.C., Oregon City, Oregon, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Dwight C. Holton, United States Attorney, District of Oregon, Adrian L. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


The Honorable Dennis J. Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 19, 2010. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation dated (#17) July 19, 2010 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 USC § 405(g), and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Patton v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 20, 2010
Civil No. 09-682-HU (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Patton v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LISA PATTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-682-HU (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2010)