From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pattison v. Sandoval

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2022
3:20-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00287-MMD-CSD

04-04-2022

DANTE H. PATTISON, Plaintiff v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants


ORDER

RE: ECF NO. 119

Craig S. Denney United States Magistrate Judge

Before the court is Plaintiffs motion requesting a transcript from March 31, 2022, hearing at Government expense. (ECF No. 119.)

When an inmate is granted in forma pauperis status, “the court may direct payment by the United States of the expenses of … preparing a transcript of proceedings before a United States magistrate judge in any civil or criminal case, if such transcript is required by the district court, in the case of proceedings conducted under section 636(b) of this title[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) (emphasis added).

Plaintiffs request for a transcript (ECF No. 119) is DENIED. There are detailed minutes of the hearing set forth at ECF No. 118, and under these circumstances, the court cannot conclude the transcript of the hearing is required by the district court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pattison v. Sandoval

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2022
3:20-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Pattison v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:DANTE H. PATTISON, Plaintiff v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 4, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2022)