From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. UHC Hosp. of Lafayette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1383 SECTION P (W.D. La. Oct. 31, 2017)

Summary

dismissing the plaintiff's allegation that doctors implanted a microchip device in his body during an "illegal surgery" as "so delusional as to warrant dismissal as frivolous"

Summary of this case from Hamilton v. McCune

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1383 SECTION P

10-31-2017

LIONEL PATTERSON v. UHC HOSPITAL OF LAFAYETTE, ET AL


DISTRICT JUDGE

MEMORANDUM ORDER B. Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Rec. Doc. 3]

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. [Rec. Doc. 3] A litigant moving for a preliminary injunction must demonstrate each of the following: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a substantial threat that failure to grant the injunction will result in irreparable injury; (3) the threatened injury outweighs any damage that the injunction will cause to the adverse party; and (4) the injunction will not have an adverse effect on the public interest. Women's Med. Ctr. of Northwest Houston v. Bell, 248 F.3d 411, 418-20 (5th Cir.2001). "An injunction is an extraordinary remedy and should not issue except upon a clear showing of possible irreparable harm." Lewis v. S.S. Baune, 534 F.2d 1115, 1121 (5th Cir.1976).

Plaintiff cannot prevail because he has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. For the reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has determined that plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed as frivolous. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. B. Appointment of Counsel [Rec. Doc. 4]

Plaintiff has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. [Rec. Doc. 4] "A district court should appoint counsel in a civil rights case only if presented with exceptional circumstances." Norton v. Dimazana, 122 F.3d 286, 293 (5th Cir. 1997). Having considered that fact, as well as the factors set forth in Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 213 (5th Cir. 1982), the Court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted. As undersigned has determined that plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed as frivolous, plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for to Preliminary Injunction [Rec. Doc. 3] is hereby DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for to Appoint Counsel [Rec. Doc. 4] is hereby DENIED. In Chambers, Lafayette , Louisiana October 31, 2017.

/s/ _________

PATRICK J. HANNA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Patterson v. UHC Hosp. of Lafayette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1383 SECTION P (W.D. La. Oct. 31, 2017)

dismissing the plaintiff's allegation that doctors implanted a microchip device in his body during an "illegal surgery" as "so delusional as to warrant dismissal as frivolous"

Summary of this case from Hamilton v. McCune
Case details for

Patterson v. UHC Hosp. of Lafayette

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL PATTERSON v. UHC HOSPITAL OF LAFAYETTE, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1383 SECTION P (W.D. La. Oct. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

O'Laughlin v. Corrigan

he sort of claim that courts routinely dismiss as factually frivolous. See, e.g., Dodson v. Haley, No.…

Hamilton v. McCune

e sort of claim that courts routinely dismiss as factually frivolous. See, e.g., Dodson v. Haley, No.…