From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 14, 1956
287 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)

Opinion

No. 28167.

March 14, 1956.

Appeal from the County Court, Hunt County, John W. Gover, J.

G. C. Harris, Greenville, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $200.

The complaint appears to be sufficient but the information upon which appellant was convicted is fatally defective in that it fails to designate or name appellant or any other person as having committed the offense, nor does it allege that the name of the accused is unknown.

Art. 414 Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. (4) requires that an information 'contain the name of the accused, or state that his name is unknown and give a reasonably accurate description of him.'

There being a valid complaint upon which a new information naming the accused may be presented, the prosecution will not be dismissed. See Simmons v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. R., 252 S.W.2d 711.

Because of the insufficiency of the information, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.


Summaries of

Patterson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 14, 1956
287 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
Case details for

Patterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marion PATTERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 14, 1956

Citations

287 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
162 Tex. Crim. 535

Citing Cases

State v. Eaves

On appeal where the information is determined to be fatally defective but there is a valid complaint so that…

London v. State

See Article 21.21, V.A.C.C.P. In Patterson v. State, 162 Tex.Crim. R., 287 S.W.2d 949 (1956), this Court was…