From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Santini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM

04-11-2013

GERALD LEE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE SANTINI, M.D., CAMACHO, P.A., and FIVE JOHN/JANE DOES, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. [Docket No. 58; Filed March 15, 2013] (the "Motion"). On March 5, 2013, Defendants Santini and Camacho ("Defendants") filed a Response [#60]. In the Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to compel Defendants to respond to a Request for Admission. As Defendants explain in their Response [#60], on May 11, 2012, discovery was stayed. See Order [#34].

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#58] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Santini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Patterson v. Santini

Case Details

Full title:GERALD LEE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE SANTINI, M.D., CAMACHO, P.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)