From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Santini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM

04-09-2013

GERALD LEE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE SANTINI, M.D., CAMACHO, P.A., and FIVE JOHN/JANE DOES, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to File a Surreply [Docket No. 50; Filed October 29, 2012] (the "Motion") and Plaintiff's Surreply to Defendants' Reply [#49; Filed October 29, 2012] (the "Surreply") relating to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [#45]. On November 6, 2012, Defendants filed a Response [#52]. On November 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Reply [#53].

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED and the Surreply is STRICKEN. Surreplies are not contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of Practice. The Court is adequately advised of the issues on the parties' present briefings.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Santini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Patterson v. Santini

Case Details

Full title:GERALD LEE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE SANTINI, M.D., CAMACHO, P.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2013)