From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 2008
49 A.D.3d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 105065/05.

March 11, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Deborah A. Kaplan, J.), entered July 25, 2007, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Fotopoulos, Rosenblatt Green, New York (Constantine D. Fotopoulos of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ.


The motion was properly denied on the ground that defendants' expert did not address the MRI reports showing herniated discs, which in conjunction with other evidence was indicative of serious injury ( see Wadford v Gruz, 35 AD3d 258; Nix v Yang Gao Xiang, 19 AD3d 227). Since defendants failed to meet their initial burden on the motion, there is no need to consider plaintiffs opposing papers ( see id.).


Summaries of

Patterson v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 2008
49 A.D.3d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Patterson v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:ISADORA PATTERSON, Respondent, v. ARTURO RIVERA et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2038
852 N.Y.S.2d 762

Citing Cases

YI v. CANELA

conducted July 10, 2006, and found no evidence of acute or recent injury. Defendant's neurologist, Edward…

Volpini v. S & F Supplies, Inc.

Mr. Volpini's bill of particulars alleges that Mr. Volpini suffered a herniated cervical disc from the May…