From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 24, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-02084-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-02084-LJO-SMS

08-24-2011

CLARENCE REITH PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

TRISH M. HIGGINS SITTHIKIT CHARIYASATIT ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP SITTHIKIT CHARIYASATIT Attorneys for Defendant MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC PETER SEAN BRADLEY PENNER, BRADLEY & SIMONIAN PETER SEAN BRADLEY Attorney for Plaintiff CLARENCE REITH PATTERSON, JR.


TRISH M. HIGGINS (STATE BAR NO. 119215)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

SITTHIKIT CHARIYASATIT (STATE BAR NO. 252028)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

PETER SEAN BRADLEY, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 109258)

PENNER, BRADLEY & SIMONIAN

Attorney for Plaintiff

CLARENCE REITH PATTERSON, JR.

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING DEADLINES FOR

EXPERT DISCLOSURES

Plaintiff Clarence Reith Patterson, Jr. and Defendant Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC (collectively "the Parties") stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Conference Order dated February 16, 2011 set the deadline for the disclosure of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), (A) and (B), for September 1, 2011;

WHEREAS, the trial is not set to start until May 29, 2012;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree, considering the schedules of the Parties, including trial schedules, that there is insufficient time for the Parties to complete expert reports or expert discovery before the discovery cutoff;

WHEREAS, the Parties have not sought any previous scheduling changes in this matter;

WHEREAS, the Parties' stipulation would not affect the Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline, the Settlement Conference Date, Pre-Trial Conference Date, or the Trial Date scheduled for May 29, 2012 set by the Court;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel as follows:

1. the last day for disclosure of experts and expert reports shall be continued from September 1, 2011 to December 1, 2011;

2. the last day for disclosure of supplemental experts and supplemental reports shall be continued from September 15, 2011 to December 15, 2011; and

3. the close of discovery of expert witnesses shall be continued from

November 1, 2011 to January 1, 2012.

TRISH M. HIGGINS

SITTHIKIT CHARIYASATIT

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

SITTHIKIT CHARIYASATIT

Attorneys for Defendant

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

PETER SEAN BRADLEY

PENNER, BRADLEY & SIMONIAN

PETER SEAN BRADLEY

Attorney for Plaintiff

CLARENCE REITH PATTERSON, JR.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Patterson v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 24, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-02084-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Patterson v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE REITH PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-02084-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)