ANALYSIS¶ 5. “Mississippi Code Annotated section 71–5–531 (Rev. 2011) states: ‘In any judicial proceedings under this section, the findings of the [B]oard of [R]eview as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of said court shall be confined to questions of law.’ ” Patterson v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec., 95 So.3d 719, 721 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2012). Further, “[w]here there is the required substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance of the decision of the Board of Review.... Therefore, [the appellate court] must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency.”
¶5. "Mississippi Code Annotated section 71-5-531 (Rev. 2011) states: 'In any judicial proceedings under this section, the findings of the [B]oard of [R]eview as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of said court shall be confined to questions of law.'" Patterson v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec., 95 So. 3d 719, 721 (¶9) (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). Further, "[w]here there is the required substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance of the decision of the Board of Review. . . . Therefore, [the appellate court] must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency."
Therefore, the appellate court must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency.Patterson v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec., 95 So.3d 719, 721 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (quoting Broome v. Miss. Emp't Sec. Comm'n, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (¶ 12) (Miss.2006)). DISCUSSION