From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
1:19-cv-01401-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01401-NE-JLT (PC)

06-08-2021

VESTER L. PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-18, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE

(Doc. 26)

21-DAY DEADLINE

Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint naming as defendants S. Tharratt, Randall Caldron, California Correctional Health Care Services, and John Does 1-18, whom Plaintiff identifies as the Hepatitis-C Treatment Committee members. (Doc. 10.) On October 16, 2020, the Court entered a screening order finding that the First Amended Complaint states a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against Does 1-18 and finding no other claims cognizable as pleaded. (Doc. 12.) Pursuant to the Court's order, Plaintiff filed a notice that he would proceed only on the cognizable claim and not seek to amend his pleading.

On May 14, 2021, the Court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to identify the John Doe defendants so that service could be attempted by the United States Marshal. (Doc. 25.) Instead of identifying the Doe defendants, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Amend First Amended Complaint to add as defendants Steven Tharrat, M.D., Director of Health Care Operations, and CCHCS. (Doc. 26.) Because Dr. Tharrat and CCHCS are already named as defendants in the First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's request (Doc. 26) is DENIED as moot.

Plaintiff is advised that Robert Steven Tharratt passed away on August 20, 2020, and that Dr. Joseph Bick is the current Acting Director of the Division of Correctional Health Care Services. CDCR, https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/insidecdcr/2020/10/06/dr-robert-tharratt-longtime-cchcs-medical-director-passes-away/ (last visited June 9, 2021); CDCR, https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/about-cdcr/executive-staff/ (last visited June 9, 2021).

Upon consideration, the Court will grant Plaintiff one final opportunity to identify the Doe defendants in order to effect service and move this case forward. Within 21 days , Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint that identifies the Does by name and basis for liability. No. other claims or defendants should be included in this amended pleading. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a voluntary dismissal.

Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
1:19-cv-01401-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Patterson v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:VESTER L. PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-18, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01401-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)