From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2023
2:20-cv-01614-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01614-JAD-DJA

01-25-2023

Jaysen Alexander Patterson, Petitioner v. Calvin Johnson, et. al., Respondents.


ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SECOND REQUEST

[ECF NO. 58]

Counseled Petitioner Jaysen Patterson brings an unopposed motion to extend by 62 days the time to file his reply to the Answer to the Second Amended Petition, arguing that more time is needed because counsel's caseload has greatly expanded. This is Patterson's second request for an extension. With good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time [ECF No. 58] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Patterson has until March 27, 2023, to file his reply to the Answer to the Second Amended Petition.

ECF No. 58.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2023
2:20-cv-01614-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Patterson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Jaysen Alexander Patterson, Petitioner v. Calvin Johnson, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-01614-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2023)