From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Hosiery Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1938
197 S.E. 597 (N.C. 1938)

Opinion

(Filed 15 June, 1938.)

Appeal and Error § 38 —

When the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by the defendants from Spears, J., at April Term, 1938, of DURHAM. Affirmed.

A. W. Kennon for plaintiffs, appellees.

R. O. Everett for interveners, appellees.

William W. Sledge and Fuller, Reade Fuller for defendants, appellants.


This is an action to restrain the defendants from further declaring and/or paying dividends on any stock of the defendant corporation until the accrued dividends on the 6% preferred stock of the plaintiffs, and on the stock of other nonassenting shareholders, are paid and/or discharged. His Honor, Judge Spears, entered judgment continuing the temporary restraining order theretofore issued by his Honor, Judge Williams, until the final determination of the action, from which judgment the defendants appealed, assigning error.

Devin, J., not sitting, and the remaining six members of the Court being equally divided in opinion as to whether there are on the record any disputed facts which should be determined before final judgment, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Braswell v. Town of Wilson, 212 N.C. 833, and cases there cited. This leaves undecided the questions of law sought to be presented, as they do not presently arise.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Hosiery Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1938
197 S.E. 597 (N.C. 1938)
Case details for

Patterson v. Hosiery Mills

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS L. PATTERSON ET AL., TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF LUCY L. MOREHEAD AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1938

Citations

197 S.E. 597 (N.C. 1938)
197 S.E. 597

Citing Cases

Brantley v. R. R

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…