From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Ford Motor Company

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 18, 1993
852 S.W.2d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 62613.

May 18, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

James J. Logan, McMichael Logan, Chesterfield, for claimant, appellant.

Richard J. Fitzgerald, Luke Cunliff, P.C., St. Louis, for employer, respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the dismissal, for failure to prosecute, of his workers' compensation claim. We affirm. The Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Patterson v. Ford Motor Company

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 18, 1993
852 S.W.2d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Patterson v. Ford Motor Company

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. PATTERSON, CLAIMANT/APPELLANT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 18, 1993

Citations

852 S.W.2d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)