From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Barber

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 907 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1861.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 7, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:10-cv-O0025-MBS).

Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Barber, No. 0:10-cv-00025-MBS, 2010 WL 2404446 (D.S.C. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Barber

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 907 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Patterson v. Barber

Case Details

Full title:Patricia T. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James R. BARBER, III…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 907 (4th Cir. 2010)