Opinion
1:08CV188.
October 25, 2010
ORDER
On September 15, 2009, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.
The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 11] be DENIED, that the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 14] be GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED, and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Dated: October 25, 2010