From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 30, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-02191-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-02191-JAD-BNW

03-30-2020

Jaysen Patterson, Plaintiff, v. Romeo Aranas, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General HENRY H. KIM (Bar No. 14390) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 486-3095 (phone) (702) 486-3773 (fax) Email: hkim@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants James Dzurenda, Bob Faulkner, Martin Naughton, and Frances Oakman


AARON D. FORD

Attorney General
HENRY H. KIM (Bar No. 14390)

Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 486-3095 (phone)
(702) 486-3773 (fax)
Email: hkim@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants
James Dzurenda, Bob Faulkner,
Martin Naughton, and Frances Oakman Order Granting
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT PROPOSED STIPULATION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants, James Dzurenda, Bob Faulkner, Martin Naughton, and Frances Oakman, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, and Henry H. Kim, Deputy Attorney General, hereby file this Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Proposed Stipulation to Dismiss pursuant to this Court's Minute Order (ECF No. 18).

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 28, 2020, parties reached a settlement at the Early Mediation Conference. (ECF No. 18). The Court ordered that proposed stipulation to dismiss be submitted by March 30, 2020. (ECF No. 18). Defense counsel sent out to Patterson a proposed settlement agreement as well as a stipulation and order for dismissal. Patterson responded with a letter proposing several changes to the terms of the settlement agreement. Parties have not yet finalized the terms of the settlement agreement.

II. ARGUMENT

Defense counsel has been working diligently to finalize the terms of the settlement agreement with Patterson. Accordingly, Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant additional 45 days to submit a proposed stipulation to dismiss so that parties can finalize the terms of the settlement agreement.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant additional 45 days to submit a proposed stipulation and order of dismissal. With the 45-day extension, the proposed stipulation and order of dismissal would be due May 14, 2020.

DATED this 30th day of March, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

By: /s/ Henry H. Kim

HENRY H. KIM (Bar No. 14390)

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to extend time [ECF No. 20] is GRANTED. The parties have until May 14, 2020, to submit their proposed stipulation and order of dismissal.

/s/_________

U.S. District Judge 3-30-2020


Summaries of

Patterson v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 30, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-02191-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Patterson v. Aranas

Case Details

Full title:Jaysen Patterson, Plaintiff, v. Romeo Aranas, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 30, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-02191-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2020)