From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Aramark Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Apr 14, 2010
CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-111 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 14, 2010)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-111.

April 14, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


This case was removed to this Court from the Grant County, Indiana, Circuit Court by Defendant based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 3.) The Notice of Removal alleges that upon belief, Plaintiff Archie Patterson is a resident of Grant County, Indiana. (Notice of Removal ¶ 5.)

Defendant's jurisdictional allegations, however, inadequately set forth the Plaintiff's citizenship. The "residency" of a party is meaningless for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, as "citizenship is what matters." Guar. Nat'l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs., 101 F.3d 57, 58-59 (7th Cir. 1996) (explaining that statements concerning a party's "residency" are not proper allegations of citizenship as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc., 255 F.3d 410, 412 (7th Cir. 2001). "It is well-settled that when the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the court must dismiss the suit." Held v. Held, 137 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). "For natural persons, state citizenship is determined by one's domicile." Dausch v. Rykse, 9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see also Am.'s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992) ("In federal law citizenship means domicile, not residence.").

Furthermore, "[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge." Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1057 n. 1 (S.D. Ill. 2006) (citing Am.'s Best Inns, 980 F.2d at 1074); Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003); Multi-M Int'l, Inc. v. Paige Med. Supply Co., 142 F.R.D. 150, 152 (N.D. Ill. 1992).

Therefore, the Defendant is ORDERED to file an amended Notice of Removal forthwith, properly alleging on personal knowledge the citizenship of Plaintiff Archie Patterson.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Aramark Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Apr 14, 2010
CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-111 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Patterson v. Aramark Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

Date published: Apr 14, 2010

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-111 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 14, 2010)