Opinion
February 1, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).
Plaintiff, the owner of land adjacent to that of defendant City, paid fees to the City for many years for a permit giving it the use of an access driveway to a State highway. The State built the highway by virtue of an easement acquired through eminent domain. Plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that by virtue of the condemnation, the City can no longer require it to obtain a permit.
The IAS Court properly found that the State's condemnation, which may not be "extended by inference or implication" (Schulman v. People, 10 N.Y.2d 249, 255), did not create an easement for plaintiff to cross defendant City's land, and dismissed the complaint (see, e.g., Bersani Bldg. v. State of New York, 21 A.D.2d 848).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach and Ross, JJ.