From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pattenaude v. Lafler

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 21, 2008
CASE NO. 07-14385 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07-14385.

March 21, 2008


ORDER


Defendants filed a Motion for Summary [dkt. #14] Judgment on January 25, 2008. On March 6, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff for failing to respond to Defendants' motion within 21 days, see E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(1)(B), and ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why Defendants' motion should not be granted. Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's order.

Additionally, the Court notes that Plaintiff, a prisoner in a state correctional facility, failed to properly exhaust all of the administrative remedies available to him. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 2378 (2006). Plaintiff's grievance in this case failed to comply with the Michigan Department of Corrections' grievance policy because it did not include "the names of all those involved in the issue being grieved. . . ." As such, Plaintiff did not properly exhaust his administrative remedies and his claim must be dismissed. See Woodford, supra. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's cause of action is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pattenaude v. Lafler

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 21, 2008
CASE NO. 07-14385 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Pattenaude v. Lafler

Case Details

Full title:KEITH PATTENAUDE, SR., #373137 Plaintiff, v. BLAINE LAFLER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 21, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 07-14385 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2008)