From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2024
3:23cv672 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2024)

Opinion

3:23cv672

03-18-2024

QUINCY MICHAEL PATRICK, Plaintiff v. JOHN RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants


Schwab Magistrate Judge

ORDER

JULIA K. MUNLEY JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

AND NOW, this 18th day of March 2024, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) Plaintiff Quincy Michael Patrick's objection (Doc. 11) is OVERRULED:

2) The Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED;

3) Plaintiffs amended complaint (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);

4) Plaintiffs claims as asserted against Magisterial District Court Judge Michael J. Dotzel, Wilkes Barre Township Police Department, the “victims,” the “district attorney, ” the Luzerne County Convention Center Authority, Mohegan Sun Arena, and SMG are DISMISSED with prejudice without leave to amend; and

5) Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint only as to his claims against Officer John Rodriguez and the unnamed police officers. Should plaintiff fail to file a second amended complaint in accordance with this order, plaintiff's case will be dismissed with prejudice against these defendants and the Clerk of Court will be directed to close this matter.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2024
3:23cv672 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Patrick v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:QUINCY MICHAEL PATRICK, Plaintiff v. JOHN RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 18, 2024

Citations

3:23cv672 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2024)