Opinion
2:23-cv-00630- JLR
10-23-2023
ANNA PATRICK, DOUGLAS MORRILL, ROSEANNE MORRILL, LEISA GARRETT, ROBERT NIXON, SAMANTHA NIXON, DAVID BOTTONFIELD, ROSEMARIE BOTTONFIELD, TASHA RYAN, ROGELIO VARGAS, MARILYN DEWEY, PETER ROLLINS, RACHAEL ROLLINS, KATRINA BENNY, SARA ERICKSON, GREG LARSON, and JAMES KING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID L. RAMSEY, III, individually; HAPPY HOUR MEDIA GROUP, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; THE LAMPO GROUP, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, Defendants.
ALBERT LAW PLLC Gregory W Albert, WSBA No. 42673 Jonah L Ohm Campbell, WSBA No. 55701 Tallman Harlow Trask, IV, WSBA No. 60280 FRIEDMAN RUBIN PLLC (SEATTLE- DOWNTOWN) Roger S. Davidheiser, WSBA No. 18638 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Patricia A. Eakes, WSBA No. 18888 Damon C. Elder, WSBA No. 46754 Tyler Weaver, WSBA No. 29413 Andrew DeCarlow, WSBA No. 54471 Attorneys for Defendants David L. Ramsey, III and The Lampo Group, LLC
ALBERT LAW PLLC
Gregory W Albert, WSBA No. 42673
Jonah L Ohm Campbell, WSBA No. 55701
Tallman Harlow Trask, IV, WSBA No. 60280
FRIEDMAN RUBIN PLLC (SEATTLE- DOWNTOWN)
Roger S. Davidheiser, WSBA No. 18638 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Patricia A. Eakes, WSBA No. 18888
Damon C. Elder, WSBA No. 46754
Tyler Weaver, WSBA No. 29413
Andrew DeCarlow, WSBA No. 54471
Attorneys for Defendants David L. Ramsey, III and The Lampo Group, LLC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR LAMPO DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, the Court issued an order on October 12, 2023, granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants David L. Ramsey III and The Lampo Group, LLC (“the Lamp Defendants”), WHEREAS, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the current deadline for the Lampo Defendants to answer the Complaint is October 26, 2023, and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and the Lampo Defendants have met and conferred regarding that deadline, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and the Lampo Defendants stipulate that the deadline should be extended to November 9, 2023, and ask that the Court enter an Order setting that deadline for the Lampo Defendants' answer.
STIPULATED TO.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.