From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Patent Construction Systems

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1053 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1053.

February 3, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 29, 2005, and was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22), filed on January 13, 2006, recommended that Defendant Patent Construction Systems' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2006:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-named Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated January 13, 2006, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Patent Construction Systems

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1053 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Patrick v. Patent Construction Systems

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK and CHARLENE ADAMSON, Administrators of the Estate of Timothy…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 3, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1053 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2006)