From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 14, 2014
14-CC-0100 (La. Mar. 14, 2014)

Opinion

14-CC-0100

03-14-2014

RODERICK CHRISTOPHER PATRICK v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., ET AL


Hughes, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent and would grant the writ. The court of appeal cites "discussions about settling the matter" in ordering that each party would bear its own costs, rather than awarding costs to the prevailing plaintiff. Settlement discussions are not admissible evidence, LSA-C.E. art 408. I would award all costs to the prevailing party.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 14, 2014
14-CC-0100 (La. Mar. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Patrick v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK CHRISTOPHER PATRICK v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., ET AL

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 14, 2014

Citations

14-CC-0100 (La. Mar. 14, 2014)