From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:22-cv-02846-PA-BFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02846-PA-BFM

01-02-2024

MORRIS PATRICK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Interim Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Interim Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Interim Report and Recommendation is accepted.

2. Defendant San Bernardino County's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 29) is granted in part.

3. Defendant McCormic's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 54) is denied.

4. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either:

(a) file a Third Amended Complaint remedying the deficiencies detailed in the Interim Report and Recommendation; or

(b) notify the Court that he intends to proceed on the claims that remain in the Second Amended Complaint.

5. The Court Clerk shall serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:22-cv-02846-PA-BFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Patrick v. Cnty. of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS PATRICK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-02846-PA-BFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)