From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-72

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-58 (RMU/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-58 (RMU/JMF)

01-19-2012

PATRICK COLLINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-72, Defendants.


ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, hereby,

ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing by February 10, 2012, why this Court can assert jurisdiction over any defendant (a) who is not domiciled in the District of Columbia, or (b) as to whom plaintiff lacks a good faith basis to assert that he or she committed the act that is the premise of the plaintiff's claim for relief in the District of Columbia, and why venue is proper unless the defendant resides in the District of Columbia. It is further, hereby,

ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [#16] is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

________________________

JOHN M. FACCIOLA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-72

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-58 (RMU/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-72

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK COLLINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-72, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-58 (RMU/JMF) (D.D.C. Jan. 19, 2012)