From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patricia v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1989
149 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 10, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Ferraro, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

During the early morning hours of May 23, 1981, the plaintiff was walking on a public street in Ossining, New York, when she was accosted by the defendant Matthew Brown who claimed that he had a knife and demanded that she walk with him to a bus parking lot owned by Vanguard Tours, Inc. (hereinafter Vanguard) located some 100 yards away. Once in the parking lot, the plaintiff was forced into an unlocked bus where she was raped, sodomized and robbed. The plaintiff subsequently commenced this action against both Brown and Vanguard to recover damages for emotional trauma and physical injuries resulting from the attack. The plaintiff contends that Brown, a former Vanguard employee, had slept in a bus on Vanguard's property and that his presence created a known, dangerous condition which obligated Vanguard to control his behavior. The Supreme Court granted summary judgment to Vanguard and the plaintiff appeals.

We agree with the Supreme Court, Rockland County, that no duty may be imposed upon Vanguard to protect the plaintiff from the criminal acts of Brown. While a duty may be imposed on a landowner to take minimal security precautions to protect tenants and visitors from reasonably foreseeable criminal activities of third parties on the landowner's premises, at bar, neither the plaintiff nor the crimes were connected with the premises (see, Waters v. New York City Hous. Auth., 69 N.Y.2d 225). Despite the plaintiff's contentions to the contrary, even if Brown were a trespasser sleeping in the bus, Vanguard had neither the ability nor a reasonable opportunity to control those acts of Brown's which caused harm to the plaintiff. We note that there is no evidence of prior violence on Vanguard's premises and nothing to indicate that Vanguard had notice that Brown's conduct was likely to endanger the safety of others (see, De Ryss v. New York Cent. R.R. Co., 275 N.Y. 85; cf., Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 507; Blatt v. New York City Hous. Auth., 123 A.D.2d 591, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 603). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Patricia v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1989
149 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Patricia v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA B., Appellant, v. MATTHEW BROWN, Defendant, and VANGUARD TOURS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 791

Citing Cases

Paz v. Penson/Improved Dwellings Co.

The defendant impleaded EPIC Security Limited (hereinafter EPIC), alleging the existence and breach of an…

Musinski v. Harran Transportation Co., Inc.

These actions, insofar as they involve the moving defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (hereinafter Sears),…