From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paton v. Brockenborough

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:18-cv-00628 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-00628 JAM DB P

09-01-2021

EARLIE PATON, Plaintiff, v. R. BROCKENBOROUGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 33.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. ////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2021 (ECF No. 33), are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case


Summaries of

Paton v. Brockenborough

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:18-cv-00628 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Paton v. Brockenborough

Case Details

Full title:EARLIE PATON, Plaintiff, v. R. BROCKENBOROUGH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-00628 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)