From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patillo v. Sysco Foods of Ark. LLC

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 6, 2017
No. 17-1110 (8th Cir. Dec. 6, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1110

12-06-2017

Lateshia Patillo Plaintiff - Appellant v. Sysco Foods of Arkansas LLC Defendant - Appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus on Behalf of Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock [Unpublished] Before SHEPHERD, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Lateshia Patillo appeals the district court's order dismissing her employment-discrimination action, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Upon de novo review, see Blakley v. Schlumberger Tech. Corp., 648 F.3d 921, 931 (8th Cir. 2011), we vacate the dismissal order and remand the case to the district court. The court is instructed to reconsider the issues in this case, including whether an intake questionnaire Patillo filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission constituted a valid administrative charge of discrimination, in light of Supreme Court precedent including Fed. Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389 (2008), and Edelman v. Lynchburg Coll., 535 U.S. 106 (2002).


Summaries of

Patillo v. Sysco Foods of Ark. LLC

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 6, 2017
No. 17-1110 (8th Cir. Dec. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Patillo v. Sysco Foods of Ark. LLC

Case Details

Full title:Lateshia Patillo Plaintiff - Appellant v. Sysco Foods of Arkansas LLC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1110 (8th Cir. Dec. 6, 2017)

Citing Cases

Patillo v. Sysco Foods of Ark., LLC

The Eighth Circuit remanded to this Court for further consideration, in light of Supreme Court precedent, as…