From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patillo v. Holt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 3, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-1020 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-CV-1020

04-03-2012

RAYMOND SEBASTIAN PATILLO, Petitioner v. RONNIE HOLT, et al., Respondents


(JUDGE CAPUTO)

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE MANNION)

ORDER

NOW this 3 day of April, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion (Doc. 8) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED.
(2) Patillo's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.

_______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Patillo v. Holt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 3, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-1020 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Patillo v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND SEBASTIAN PATILLO, Petitioner v. RONNIE HOLT, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-CV-1020 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2012)