Opinion
Argued October 28, 1925 —
Decided February 1, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 652.
For the respondent, Edwards Smith and Walter L. Glenney.
For the appellants, Kent Kent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.