From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patel v. United States

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 8, 2021
Civil Action 21-2263 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 8, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-2263 (UNA)

09-08-2021

RAJ K. PATEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint, application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and “Motion to Receive Notice of Filing by E-mail.” Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

The original complaint (ECF No. 1) and application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) did not bear plaintiff's signature as is required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a). Pursuant to the Court's August 27, 2021, Order (ECF No. 4), plaintiff submitted signed copies of these documents (ECF Nos. 5-6).

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint and finds that its factual allegations, including assertions that defendants have taken his “intellectual property [and] word patterns, through means and methods of advanced weaponry . . . [under] the control of the United States, . . . the F.B.I. and/or C.I.A., ” Compl. at 2-3 (emphasis removed), largely are incoherent, irrational or wholly incredible. As such, the complaint is subject to dismissal as frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992) (“[A] finding of factual frivolousness is appropriate when the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible[.]”); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”); Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints . . . postulating events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind.”).

The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and Motion to Receive Notice of Filing by E-mail, and dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. An is issued separately.


Summaries of

Patel v. United States

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 8, 2021
Civil Action 21-2263 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Patel v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAJ K. PATEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 21-2263 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 8, 2021)

Citing Cases

Patel v. United States

Plaintiff has filed multiple similar lawsuits in federal courts around the country, all of which have been…