holding that a realtor association's database was not a “trade secret” because it had been “distributed widely to its realtor members and potential purchasers”
Summary of this case from Ameritox, Ltd. v. SavelichNo. 95-2704
July 10, 1996.
Appeal from the M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
holding that a realtor association's database was not a “trade secret” because it had been “distributed widely to its realtor members and potential purchasers”
Summary of this case from Ameritox, Ltd. v. Savelichholding that defendant was not entitled to copies of transcripts at government expense in advance of filing suit
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Brownholding that where summary judgment is appropriate for federal antitrust claims, it is likewise appropriate for analogous claims brought under Maryland antitrust statutes
Summary of this case from Imaging Center, Inc. v. Western Maryland Health Systems, Inc.holding that a realtor association's computer database was not a "trade secret" because the information contained on it had been "distributed widely to its realtor members and potential purchasers"
Summary of this case from Lejeune v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.granting motion to dismiss and finding no antitrust injury in part because doctor did "not allege injury to competition in the form of increased costs, reduced supply of services, or harm to the patient"
Summary of this case from Natkin v. Am. Osteopathic Ass'naffirming ALJ's decision that plaintiff could perform light work where the RFC limited plaintiff to standing no more than four hours
Summary of this case from Belanger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.explaining that "[p]ersonal economic injury alone" is insufficient to support a Section 1 claim of the Sherman Act because "[t]here must be some cognizable effect on the competitive market"
Summary of this case from Oliver v. JND Holdings, LLCexplaining that the personal stake exception is limited “to include only instances where the individual conspiring has a personal financial interest in the conspiracy independent of the principal”
Summary of this case from Bailey v. Atl. Auto. Corp.dismissing for failure to state Sherman Act claim, where nurse anesthetist failed to adequately allege facts necessary to demonstrate antitrust injury; complaint focused on injuries anesthetist incurred, not those the competitive market incurred; stating anesthetist alleged only staffing decision and personal economic injury
Summary of this case from Davies v. Genesis Medical CenterFull title:Patel v. Scotland Memorial Hosp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Jul 10, 1996
Unpublished decisions have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Patel v. Scotland Mem. Hosp., 91 F.3d 132…
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co.A district court has no independent duty “to scour the record in search of a genuine issue of triable…