Opinion
14-22-00769-CV
01-03-2024
DINESH B. PATEL, Appellant v. PATEL & PATEL, CPA; NARENDRA PATEL; AND NILAKUMARI PATEL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 368th District Court Williamson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22-0865-C368
Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The clerk's record was filed October 14, 2022. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the Order Granting Motion For Traditional And No-Evidence Summary Judgment in favor of Bhanukant Patel, Tikus, LLC, Padmini Inc., Patel & Patel, CPA, Nilakumari Patel, and Narendra Patel signed the order on April 18, 2022.
The Williamson County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record on or before, containing the Order Granting Motion For Traditional And No-Evidence Summary Judgment in favor of Bhanukant Patel, Tikus, LLC, Padmini Inc., Patel & Patel, CPA, Nilakumari Patel, and Narendra Patel signed the order on April 18, 2022.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.