Opinion
24344-17 11352-18 25268-18
03-09-2022
SUNIL S. PATEL & LAURIE MCANALLY PATEL, ET AL., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
COURTNEY D. JONES JUDGE
For cause, and because the parties filed duplicate documents, it is
Notwithstanding the parties' general obligations with respect to accurate and non-duplicative filings, the Court reminds the parties of the significant volume of documents in the records of these cases. Accordingly, the Court expects the parties to closely review each document, prior to its filing, to assure that is it properly filed. We are confident the parties will undertake such tasks so as not to unduly draw upon the resources of the Court. Going forward, the parties are expected to call the chambers of the presiding Judge to inform the staff of filing errors.
ORDERED that the following documents are stricken from the record in the respective docket numbers:
In Docket No. 24344-17
Exhibit(s), filed February 24, 2022 (docket entry no. 164) and Exhibit(s), filed February 24, 2022 (docket entry no. 165); and
In Docket No. 11352-18
Motion in Limine, filed February 24, 2022 (docket entry no. 161).