From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patel v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
CV 24-01669-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-01669-SK

07-02-2024

Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al


Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

On June 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (ECF 12). A response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than June 19, 2024. No timely response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint (ECF 1) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. See L.R. 41.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Patel v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
CV 24-01669-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Patel v. City of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

CV 24-01669-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)