From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patel v. Allied Collection Services, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 19, 2011
2:11-CV-143 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-CV-143 JCM (LRL).

August 19, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the court is the matter of Patel, et. al. v. Allied Collection Serv., Inc., et. al. (Case No. 2:11-cv-00143-JCM-LRL).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides: "If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action without prejudice."

Plaintiff filed the complaint on January 26, 2011. (Doc. #1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), on July 11, 2011, the clerk of the court provided notice to plaintiff that the action would be dismissed as to Antonio Parks and Priscilla Gonzales, if plaintiff did not file proof of service of process by August 10, 2011. (Doc. #14).

To date, plaintiff has failed to file proof of service with the court as to Priscilla Gonzales.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the case as to Priscilla Gonzales be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Patel v. Allied Collection Services, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 19, 2011
2:11-CV-143 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Patel v. Allied Collection Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MANGALBHAI PATEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

2:11-CV-143 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2011)