From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 27, 2018
546 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105414

03-27-2018

Jermaine PATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant Acting Pro se Jermaine C. Pate, Moberly Correctional Center, Moberly, MO. Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appellant Acting Pro se Jermaine C. Pate, Moberly Correctional Center, Moberly, MO.

Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Pate ("Movant") appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 27, 2018
546 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Pate v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jermaine PATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Mar 27, 2018

Citations

546 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)