From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pate v. Mazzant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 11, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-cv-699 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-cv-699 (UNA)

07-11-2018

Frank Edwin Pate, Plaintiff, v. Amos Mazzant, III et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, submitted a pro se complaint with two other prisoners. The complaints were severed and filed as three separate but related actions. One action was screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). and dismissed without prejudice. Fry v. Kyle, No. 18-cv-698 (UNA) (D.D.C. May 1, 2018). The plaintiff in the remaining action, Fogle v. Walton-Pratt, No. 18-cv-697 (TNM), avoided the court's initial screening process by paying the.$400 filing fee.

Unlike in forma proceedings, paid civil actions are assigned immediately to a district judge for further proceedings.

Invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the plaintiffs have sued the judges, Assistant. United States Attorneys, Special Agents of the FBI, and witnesses involved in their cases for their alleged roles in securing the plaintiffs' convictions, and all three plaintiffs have also sued the "Attorney General of the United States, Obama Administration." See Compl. Caption; Compl. ¶¶ 17-31 ("Predicate Acts Against Plaintiff Pate"). Although the names of the individual defendants may be different for each plaintiff, the reasons for dismissal under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and § 1915(A) (for prisoner actions such as this) are the same. Therefore, this case will be dismissed for the reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion issued in Fry, which is attached to the separately filed order of dismissal.

On May 26, 2015, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas convicted plaintiff of wire fraud and mail fraud. See United States v. Pate, No. 4:14-cr-00125, 2016 WL 4054912, at *4 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 2016). Plaintiff's list of defendants names nine judges, one assistant United States attorney, three FBI special agents, and one witness alleged to have committed perjury. See Compl. Caption and Compl. ¶ 28. --------

/s/_________

AMY BERMAN JACKSON

United States District Judge Date: July 11, 2018


Summaries of

Pate v. Mazzant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 11, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-cv-699 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Pate v. Mazzant

Case Details

Full title:Frank Edwin Pate, Plaintiff, v. Amos Mazzant, III et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jul 11, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-cv-699 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jul. 11, 2018)

Citing Cases

Fogle v. Walton-Pratt

The three cases have been separated for resolution. Mr. Fry's case was dismissed on May 1, 2018. Order…