From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pate v. Enter. Rent-A Car

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-338-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-338-JJB-SCR

09-03-2013

BRANDON PATE, ET AL. v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A CAR, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated August 9, 2013 (doc. no. 10) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED insofar as they sought to have the case remanded to state court. Their motion is DENIED insofar as they sought an award of costs and attorney's fees under § 1447(c).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 3rd day of September, 2013.

____________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Pate v. Enter. Rent-A Car

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-338-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Pate v. Enter. Rent-A Car

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON PATE, ET AL. v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A CAR, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-338-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Odom v. Geico Ins. Co.

Since Odom seeks damages of less than $12,000 in his complaint, there appears no possibility of his claim…